Posts Tagged Is It Worth It®

The Wheelchair Chronicles, Part II

Is It Worth It?® – The $39,952.80 Wheelchair

As referenced in Part I, I was a bit of a Pollyana in thinking that dealing with United would be merely difficult. In hindsight, I was wrong.

Going in to the process, I had reviewed my policy, and I knew that the benefits were limited to $2,500. It was with great trepidation that I accompanied my wife and son to the wheelchair clinic on September 15, 2008.

As you will see in the Delivery Ticket, the company that delivered the wheelchair (referred to herein as MobilityCo) said that my estimated co-pay was $0. To say that I was surprised was an understatement, but I happily signed. You will also see that the total retail price for the wheelchair was $22,466. More on that later.

In October and November 2008, United denied the claims for the wheelchair because “under the plan, notification was required but not received” and, as a result, “the patient may not be billed for the declined amount”. This would appear to be contrary to the Authorization Letter from United stating that “you have met the notification requirement and no further action is needed at this time”.

 The attached and redacted Explanation of Benefits contains the heart-warming words “This is not a bill”. You will also see on page 1 that United instructed me to “Pay your provider(s) when they bill you” a total of $24,409.34, for three separate claim numbers. On page 3, you will see that United paid $2,500, which was what I had expected. In the column titled “Originally Billed by the Provider”, you will see that the total of the three claims comes to $39,952.80.

 So, for those keeping score at home, the tally is as follows:

  • Delivery Ticket Retail Price: $22,466
  • Per the December 2008 EOB, my portion after United pays its $2,500 benefit: $24,409.34
  • Charges billed to United: $39,952.80

 The mind reels as the process of deciphering the puzzle begins. How can it be that, after United has paid $2,500 toward a Delivery Ticket retail price of $22,466, I owe $24,409.34?

As this happened during the holidays, I decided to wait until someone from MobilityCo called me to discuss how I could owe them more money after United had paid $2,500 than I did before. Imagine my surprise when they did not call in January…or February.

In March, I called MobilityCo. I spoke with three different people before being directed to a man I will call John (not his real name). I told John that the EOB from United indicated that I owed about $24,000 and inquired whether I could set up a payment plan. You can imagine my shock when John told me that I did not owe anything.

I asked John if he was sure, and he said that he was. When I asked John who else I might owe, he assured me that I did not owe anyone, including WheelChair Professionals. I had not heard of WheelChair Professionals and inquired about them. John told me that they handled the claim with United. More on that later…

 A bit perplexed, I hung up and thought, fleetingly, that I had won the equivalent of the lottery, but I still had nagging doubts. So, I called John back a few days later. Once again, John told me that I did not owe anything. On this call, John mentioned that MobilityCo had been paid about $9,000 in December, and they were happy with that. I asked again about WheelChair Professionals and whether I might owe them, and John once again assured me that I did not.

I remained perplexed, so much so that I shared the story with a couple of friends. One of them suggested that I call John back and get a copy of the invoice. As you see, the Statement shows a zero balance.

At this point, I should mention that I had not said anything to my wife about this, from the October EOB to the receipt of the invoice from MobilityCo showing a zero balance. As you might imagine, it would be awkward for a healthcare executive to explain to a spouse that the family might owe $24,409 or $0 or something in between for a wheelchair. Someone in the industry should be able to figure that out, right?

Even so, after three conversations with John and receipt of the invoice showing a zero balance, I broached the subject with my wife over dinner on a Friday in March, telling her that MobilityCo had repeatedly assured me that we owed nothing. In hindsight, I spoke too soon.

The following Monday, John called my wife at home demanding payment for the wheelchair. John then called me, demanding immediate payment of $16,758.20. I reminded John that he had told me three times in the previous 15 days that I owed nothing. He responded that United had discovered that it overpaid WheelChair Professionals and had then recouped it. In turn, WheelChair Professionals had recouped the overpayment from MobilityCo. Notice that the EOB says United had paid $2,500, but WheelChair Professionals had initially received at least $16,000 more than that.

My suspicions aroused, I asked John who had actually bought the wheelchair –MobilityCo or WheelChair Professionals? John answered that he thought that WheelChair Professionals had, but WheelChair Professionals said that MobilityCo had to buy the chair. I asked how MobilityCo could be in the wheelchair business and not know whether or not they bought the wheelchair. John answered that MobilityCo had just begun working with WheelChair Professionals and had not figured out how everything worked. So, I asked John, did MobilityCo think that they had received payment of $9000 in December to order the wheelchair and deliver it to us? After a too-long silence, John admitted that they did. No wonder, I told him, that they were so happy – getting paid $9,000 to order a wheelchair and spend 2 hours delivering it sounds like a good business.

To date, MobilityCo has received $18,500 of the $19,258.20 that they billed me (after they billed me $0) – $2,500 from United, $2,000 from MDA, and $14,000 from me. I have been blessed to have the resources to pay 95% of the bill that I received, even though that bill is different from the Delivery Ticket that I signed or the EOB detailing what I owed or the charges that WheelChair Professionals submitted to United. I have also been blessed with a platform to describe the abuses or incompetence or both (your choice) of the system in the hopes that reform might really occur.

Is It Worth It? In an economic sense, clearly not. Perhaps my experience is a twisted version of the laws of supply and demand, but it is obviously not an example of value principles operating in a market. In an emotional sense, yes. The freedom that the wheelchair gives my son is priceless to him.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

, , , , ,

1 Comment

Is It Worth It®: The Contrast between Higher Education and Healthcare

The Wall Street Journal published an article entitled Weighing Price and Value in Picking a College (subscription required) on July 15 about the difficult choices and trade-offs some families are making about higher education. Putting aside that we believe that price is an element of value, the article prompted me to think about both the parallels and contrasts between education and healthcare.

The following quotation was particularly interesting to me:

“Even when the economy picks up, some of this new price-consciousness is likely to endure. The engines that have enabled college costs to soar – easy credit, home-equity loans and growth in savings – have stalled. Total college costs are already up 67% in the past decade at private colleges and 84% at public four-year universities, based on College Board data, and graduates’ wages haven’t kept pace.”

Four thoughts come to mind:

  • Over the past decade, healthcare (together with health insurance) and education are the only two parts of the economy that have been able to generate 5-10% annual price inflation.
  • Price-consciousness is enabled by price transparency. The price of higher education is completely transparent, whereas the price of healthcare is almost completely opaque. I always find it curious when healthcare executives tell me that price does not matter, but they refuse to reveal the price.
  • The engine that has allowed healthcare costs to soar is the tax exclusion for employer-sponsored healthcare, which contributes to price opacity. The emerging focus on value in higher education is market-driven, whereas the strong lobbying efforts against taxing healthcare benefits will require government intervention for value-based purchasing in healthcare.
  • Paradoxically, cost is opaque in most consumer value analyses, whereas in hospitals, cost is public information. For example, the consumers referenced in the WSJ article have zero information about the actual cost of the education they are considering, only the price. Similarly, I don’t have any information about the cost of producing a plasma television or a gallon of milk. However, information about the cost of treating a patient with congestive heart failure is available, if not readily accessible.

Is It Worth It®? From the stories in the WSJ article, it appears that many people are deciding that the price of higher education, particularly Ivy League schools, is not worth it. Because price is transparent, I anticipate that colleges and universities will increasingly be forced to defend the value proposition of $50,000+ tuition. On the other hand, healthcare consumers will not become price-sensitive unless Congress taxes employer-sponsored healthcare benefits. When Americans are forced to pay for healthcare at the point of service with after-tax dollars, they will begin to demand information about price. When Americans begin to understand the price of healthcare, they will start to consider its value.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

, , , , , ,

1 Comment

Why Value in Healthcare is Important

In the June 30 edition of The New York Times, Reed Abelson wrote an article entitled Insured, but Bankrupted by Health Crises. The article focused on the story of an individual forced into bankruptcy based on costs that were not reimbursed under his “limited benefit” policy.

As someone who lives daily on the precipice of medical bankruptcy, I know very well that “limited benefit” policies are just one example of the problem. Healthcare is personal to all of us, of course, and I know that everyone has at least one compelling example of how the healthcare system, broadly defined, has failed them.

In my case, my oldest child has Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD), the most severe form of the many muscular dystrophies. In most cases, DMD is an inherited condition, with the mother as a carrier of the genetic mutation. Boys have a 50-50% chance of inheriting the gene, and girls have a 50-50% chance of becoming a carrier.

DMD is terminal, with an average life expectancy of 19 or 20. To date, there is no cure, and the general progression results in boys being confined to a wheelchair by age 12 or 13. While the boys are “up”, as we refer to it, the only therapies are physical therapy and a steroid regimen to maintain muscle strength as long as possible. Once the boys are “down”, they are relegated to a wheelchair for the rest of their lives. Ultimately, they succumb to the atrophy of the heart or the lung.

You might think that the rarity of the condition would be accounted for in the actuarial tables, and that standard health insurance policies, as opposed to “limited benefit” policies, would cover DMD. Sadly, that is not the case. As a result, I live daily with the words of the Keith Urban song, “But for the grace of God go I”.

Since we learned of our son’s condition, we have been covered under five separate insurance plans: once by United, three times by Blue Cross Blue Shield plans, and once by HealthSpring. Of those five plans, none paid more than $2,500 toward an electric wheelchair, the list (i.e. chargemaster) price for which is north of $50,000. Of those five plans, one did not pay for any physical therapy, while the other four capped the number of visits between 20-24 per year. Of the four plans that provided physical therapy, all of them paid the provider a percentage of charges. Our provider charged $400 per hour. Since we have an HSA, we used our deductible very quickly.

So, why value and not just quality? For many things in healthcare, quality is a given, while for other things, it is “the only thing”. For us, physical therapy consisted of stretches and limited physical activity, my favorite example of which was Wii bowling. Is quality is a key factor to evaluate in playing the Wii? Is It Worth It® to pay $400 an hour to have your child play a Wii?

For you, maybe the relevant example is a blood draw, or an ankle x-ray, or a throat swab for strep – quality should be, and usually is, assumed in those examples. In such a case, the other elements of value, such as price, efficiency, convenience, access, and experience, should be the determining factors in choice. On the other hand, if you need brain surgery, quality is probably the dominant factor in your decision, and price, if you have insurance, the least.

The issue for America at this point in history is that there are relatively few brain surgeries and an abundance of blood draws and ankle x-rays and throat swabs. We can afford to pay premium prices for premium services, but we cannot and should not pay premium prices for commodities. Our goal is to help people figure out the difference between commodities and premium services, and everything in between.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Is It Worth It®: The Prevention and Wellness Trust

As evidenced by the volume of posts on the House Tri-Committee plan for health reform, Chairmen Rangel, Waxman, and Miller delivered a broad and comprehensive plan for reforming health insurance coverage and services. Even so, one proposal screamed for an installment of “Is It Worth It®”.

The House proposes the creation of the “Prevention and Wellness Trust”. This sounds like something straight out of England’s National Health Service, but it’s not – just Google “Doris Matsui” to find out the champion of the concept.

The House plan reserves $15,200,000,000 over 5 years for prevention task forces, prevention and wellness research, delivery of community-based prevention and wellness services, and public health infrastructure. The Secretary of HHS is instructed to submit a national strategy every two years for improving America’s health through evidenced-based clinical and community-based prevention and wellness activities, including core public health infrastructure improvement activities.

Is It Worth It®? Only if you think all Americans are morons. Let’s be serious – as posted previously, behavior is the Number 1 factor in our health status. For free, I will suggest the national strategy here: exercise more, eat less fat and sugar, quit smoking, make sure your kids get vaccinated on time, and get a physical every 2-3 years. Could we use more resources for community health clinics and vaccines? Sure. However, we don’t need comparative effectiveness studies or strategic committees or infrastructure improvement to improve our wellness. A little pain in the pocketbook from taxing employer-sponsored healthcare benefits will work wonders in this regard.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

, , , , , ,

1 Comment